Assorted Medical Equipment for Cancer Diagnosis and Serious Illnesses
Procurement preparation- Reference:
- GRZ-ZAMMSA/SS/2026/EQUIPMENT/01
- Method:
- Single-source procurement
- Estimated:
- —
- Published:
- —
- Closes:
- —
National Project Information and Opportunities
Procurement preparation · Programme in development; procurement being prepared under GRZ-ZAMMSA/SS/2026/EQUIPMENT/01
Not reported by the responsible institution.
Not reported by the responsible institution.
Physical completion is what the responsible institution reported, on the date shown. ZEPRA does not calculate physical progress from money spent, and financial completion should not be read as work done.
The Zambia Health Medical Equipment and Turnkey Healthcare Infrastructure Programme is a proposed national health-sector initiative covering the supply, delivery, installation and commissioning of specialised medical equipment and supporting healthcare infrastructure. The programme is structured to strengthen diagnostic, treatment and emergency-care capacity through equipment for cancer diagnosis, cardiovascular care, renal care, respiratory and intensive care, surgery, maternal and neonatal emergencies, laboratory services and associated clinical support. Implementation planning includes equipment procurement, site preparation, logistics, installation, commissioning, technical training, maintenance support and distribution through seven proposed regional hubs.
The programme is intended to expand access to modern diagnostic and treatment equipment, strengthen specialised clinical services and improve the availability of essential healthcare technology across Zambia.
Proposed delivery period: 300 days following the required approvals and contracting.
For detailed project information, participation or delivery coordination, sign in to the ZEPRA workspace.
Ndola · Chipata · Mansa · Lusaka · Kabompo · Choma · Mongu
Delivered across the country rather than at one location.
No site coordinates have been published for this project. It is recorded against no administrative area and appears on the national map as an area rather than a point. ZEPRA does not place a marker where the exact location is not known.
Planned, revised and actual dates are shown separately. A revised date never replaces the original.
| Milestone | Planned | Revised | Actual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Start | — | — | — |
| Completion | — | — | — |
| Procurement and approval coordination implementation | — | — | — Planned |
| Supplier and manufacturer confirmation implementation | — | — | — Planned |
| Commercial and technical negotiations implementation | — | — | — Planned |
| Contracting and production implementation | — | — | — Planned |
| Initial equipment delivery implementation | — | — | — Planned |
| Distribution to regional hubs implementation | — | — | — Planned |
| Installation and commissioning implementation | — | — | — Planned |
| Clinical and technical training implementation | — | — | — Planned |
| Maintenance and after-sales support implementation | — | — | — Planned |
No budget history recorded
Budget revisions and expenditure reports appear here as the responsible institution submits them.
One project may be delivered through several procurement processes. Each keeps its own Open Contracting identifier.
No contract awards recorded
No delays recorded
This does not by itself mean the project is on schedule — only that no delay has been reported to ZEPRA.
No public documents attached
Where an institution publishes documents on its own site, ZEPRA links to them there rather than holding a copy.
What changed on this record, when, and on whose authority. Corrections are recorded, not overwritten.
Record created
System · Prepared and published by ZEPRA from project documentation provided by Africa China Prosperity Group (Pty) Ltd.
Record prepared and published by ZEPRA.
Project documentation provided by Africa China Prosperity Group (Pty) Ltd.
Project references: ICPO/MOH-ZMB/2026/001 · MOU/MOH-ZMB/2026/001 · GRZ-ZAMMSA/SS/2026/EQUIPMENT/01
Checked by a ZEPRA data steward for completeness and internal consistency.
A low score reflects what the responsible institution has published, not the quality of the project.